Justice Olusola Williams of the Ikeja High Court has
struck out an alleged fraud suit instituted by the Economic and Financial
Crimes Commission (EFCC) against the Chairman of Innoson Motors Nigeria
Limited, Innocent Chukuwuma.
The Judge struck out the case on Wednesday following
failure on the part of EFCC to produce Chukwuma in court to face trial, even
after bench warrant was issued against him.
The anti-graft agency had dragged Chukwuma and his
company before the court, and was to be arraigned before Justice Mojisola Dada
of an Ikeja Special Offences Court on January 17, 2018, on a four-count charge
of conspiracy to obtain property by false pretence, stealing and forgery in a
transaction with Guaranty Trust Bank (GTB).
The EFCC alleged that the defendants had intent to
defraud, conspired to obtain by false pretence containers of motorcycles spare
parts and raw materials, properties of GTB from Mitsui OSK Lines Limited,
Apapa, Lagos.
They were alleged to have fraudulently induced
staff of Mitsui OSK and Maersk Line to deliver to them via their clearing
agents the goods which were imported from China in the name of GTB by falsely
pretending that they were authorised by the bank to clear the goods.
The prosecution claimed that the defendants, in order
to facilitate the fraud, forged a Bill of Laden numbered 598286020 of Maersk
Line Limited and 11007950841 of Mutsui O.S.K Lines by knowingly putting a false
GTB stamp and signature of the bank staff.
The alleged forgery was in order that the forged
documents be used or acted upon as genuine to the prejudice of any person within
Lagos or elsewhere.
According to EFCC, the offences contravened
Sections 1(1)(b), 1(3), and 8(a) of the Advanced Fee Fraud and Other Related
Offences Act 2016 and Sections 309(9), 388, 465 and 467(1)(j) of the Criminal
Code, Laws of Lagos State 2003.
The defendants, however, failed to appear before
the court in all the adjourned dates.
The case was transferred to Justice Williams after
counsel to Chukwuma wrote a petition to the NJC against Justice Dada, citing
bias and asking her to recuse herself from the trial.
Responding to Chukwuma's petition dated February
12, the NJC, through a letter signed by its Secretary, Mr. Ahmed Saleh, said
the council had in its meeting on March 9, absolved Justice Dada of any
wrongdoing and that the matter will be returned to the Chief Judge for
re-assignment to another Judge.
While striking out the matter yesterday, Justice
Williams, said a criminal matter can always be instituted whenever the
prosecution is prepared.
In a short ruling, the Judge pointed out that the
EFCC had the responsibility to produce Innoson but they never did.
“The prosecution is well aware that it is its duty
to produce a defendant in court.
“This court is not inclined to continue to waste
the tax of Lagos taxpayers. This court cannot continue to waste precious time
calling a case that is going nowhere.
“It is a criminal matter that can be instituted
anytime. I advise that the prosecution gets its acts together before coming to
court. I am inclined to strike out this case and I so do," the Judge held.
Earlier during proceedings, EFCC counsel, Ms Zainab
Ettu, informed the court that Innoson has been hiding from the anti-graft
agency.
According to her, "My Lord, the defendant has
been giving briefs to counsels but has never deemed it fit to appear in court.
“While we continue to pursue the arrest of the
defendant, it behooves on the defendant’s counsel as Ministers in the temple of
Justice to produce their client.
“They need to perform their duty to the court and
ensure that their client comes to court. If they can collect briefs from him,
then they should know where he is. We are optimistic about arresting him.
“We already have a warrant for his arrest, as the
court has declared him wanted. The counsel to the defendant has brought
numerous applications, trying to stall the matter.”
Responding, Chukwuma’s counsel, Professor J.N
Mbaduga, told the court that the EFCC filed a similar suit marked FHC/L/565c
before a Federal High Court sitting in Lagos.
“While the suit was still pending, the EFCC went
ahead and filed another suit with the same subject matter against the
defendants.
“Some of the facts arising from the case have even
proceeded before the Supreme Court. We raised a preliminary objection citing
abuse of court processes. We also raised objections on the grounds that the
defendant has not been served with the charges.
“My Lord until the EFCC can produce the defendant
in court, the court cannot exercise any jurisdiction over the defendant,” he
said.
The prosecution, however, told the court that
"for any application to be treated on behalf of a defendant, he should be
present in court, they can then decide if they want to raise an objection
before he takes his plea or after.
No comments:
Post a Comment