A Kaduna State High Court presided over by Justice
Hajaratu Gwadah on Wednesday declared that the state government has no power to
screen or issue licences to religious preachers in the state.
Delivering the judgment in a suit by the Pentecostal
Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN) challenging the constitutionality of the bill on
the regulation of religious preaching in the state, the judge maintained that
although government has the right to regulate religious activities in the
state, screening and issuing of licence to religious preachers is
unconstitutional.
The PFN had in 2016 challenged the constitutionality of the bill,
describing it is an infringement on fundamental human right.
The Christian body had among other prayers, asked the court for a declaration that setting up a
committee for the screening and licencing preachers as provided in the bill is
a violation of their rights.
The judge, however, said the bill does not seek to
abolish the rights of applicants as fundamental human rights is not absolute.
She noted however that sections 6 and 9 of the bill
which seek to screen and licence preachers, violate the constitutional rights
of the applicant.
Reacting to the judgment, counsel to the PFN, Sunny
Akanni, said he was satisfied with the judgment, adding: "Our argument is
that you cannot licence pastors because they are already licence.
“In Christianity, not only ordained pastors preach.
Every Christian is commanded ‘to go ye unto the world and preach the gospel."
According to him, "Section 38 subsection 1 of
the Nigerian Constitution allows everybody to propagate his religion in
teaching, in observance and in action.
"So when you now say pastors should be licensed,
you have infringed on their right. That is why the court agreed with us that
section 6 of the bill is against the constitutional right of PFN.
“Even though the court said the government can
regulate religion, screening and issuing licence to pastors offend the
constitutional rights of pastors (preachers).”
Counsel to the state governor, who is one of the respondents
in the case, Sanusi Usman, however, expressed dissatisfaction with the
judgment.
Usman, who is the Director of Civil Litigation in
the state Ministry of Justice, said he would appeal the judgment.
The state House of Assembly recently passed the
controversial executive bill despite a court order asking it not to take action
on the bill pending the determination of the substantive suit.
The passage of the bill was greeted with mix
reactions among Muslims and Christians with some kicking against it while
others expressed support for it.
The PFN had already initiated a contempt proceeding against
the state assembly for violating the court order by passing the bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment