Nigeria, South Africa, Democratic Republic of Congo
and Ethiopia account for 50 per cent of illicit financial flows (IFFs) in
Sub-Saharan Africa, a new report by the Brookings Institution has revealed.
IFFs often occur through trade mis-invoicing, one
of the primary methods of illegally transferring money to another country,
which occurs when exporters or importers deliberately misreport the value,
quantity or nature of goods and services in order to evade taxes, take
advantage of tax incentives, avoid capital controls or launder money.
Brookings Institution is a globally renowned American research group
founded in 1916 on Think Tank Row in Washington, D.C., which conducts research
and education in the social sciences, primarily in economics (and tax policy),
metropolitan policy, governance, foreign policy, global economy, and economic
development.
Titled: ‘Illicit Financial Flows in Africa:
Drivers, Destinations, and Policy Options’, the report recalled that on January
28, 2020, revelations around illicit financial gains by Isabel dos Santos, Africa’s
richest woman and daughter of former Angolan President, Edoardo dos Santos,
once again brought the topic of illicit financial flows to the forefront of the
conversation on domestic resource mobilisation in Africa.
"Unfortunately, illicit flows are not new to
the continent. While between 1980 and 2018, sub-Saharan Africa received nearly
$2 trillion in foreign direct investment (FDI) and official development
assistance (ODA), it emitted over $1 trillion in illicit financial flows.
"These flows, illicitly acquired and channeled
out of the continent, continue to pose a development challenge to the region,
as they remove domestic resources that are crucial for the continent’s
development," the reported added.
It stressed that over a 38-year period, between
1980 and 2018, Africa exported an aggregate $1.3 trillion of illicit financial
flows, adding that IFFs saw a notable increase in the 2000s in correspondence
to increases in trade from Africa.
However, it stated that while the high aggregate
amount of illicit financial flows may appear alarming, it was important to note
that the relative share of IFFs seems to be steady or declining.
"In 2018, illicit financial flows only made up
5 per cent of GDP, down from 8 per cent in 2012 and 2008.
“Illicit financial flows as a share of trade also
fell from 14 per cent in 2008 to 11 per cent in 2018.
"The top four emitters of illicit flows-South
Africa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, and Nigeria-emit over
50 per cent of total illicit financial flows from Africa.
"Among the top 10 emitters of illicit flows,
nine countries attribute a significant portion of total exports to natural
resources-mining products in South Africa, the Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Botswana, and
Zambia; and oil and gas in Nigeria, Republic of the
Congo, Angola, Sudan, and Cameroon.
"Natural resources provide countries with
opportunities to expand the volume of total trade, which is correlated with the
volume of illicit financial flows; studies also suggest that extractive
industries are particularly prone to illicit financial flows," the
Brookings Institution's report said.
It pointed out that as a percentage of trade, illicit
financial flows are highest in excess of 50 per cent in São Tomé and PrÃncipe
and Sierra Leone, noting that small countries tend to have higher illicit flows
as a percentage of trade.
This, the report further stated, suggested that
these countries lack the capacity to sufficiently regulate their domestic
resources.
It added: "Notably, however, and in contrast
to this trend, Ethiopia and the Republic of the Congo are found in both the top
10 emitters of total illicit flows and the top 10 emitters of illicit flows as
a percentage of trade."
But the report also explained that in general, and as
expected, larger economies like Nigeria have higher levels of illicit financial
flows.
"Indeed, we find that the top four emitters of
illicit flows-South Africa, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, and
Nigeria-emit over 50 percent of total illicit financial flows from sub-Saharan
Africa. We also find that higher taxes and higher inflation lead to higher
illicit financial outflows, suggesting that firms seek out relatively more
stable or favourable fiscal environments for their funds.
"Furthermore, we find that emerging and
developing economies in Asia and the Middle East have become major destinations
for illicit financial flows from Africa in recent years. While part of this
shift can be explained by the reduction in trade levels with developed
economies, the large upsurge of illicit flows to these economies cannot solely
be explained by those increased values," the report added.
On policy options to check illicit flows and
repatriating funds, the report observed that curbing illicit financial flows
requires cooperation at the global level.
Over the past decades, the global community, it
noted, has begun to undertake a number of initiatives aimed at reducing illicit
financial flows, including initiatives to curb money laundering and improve the
sharing of tax information across countries.
It cited three initiatives, the Financial Action
Task Force (created 1998), the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of
Information for Tax Purposes (created 2009), and the Inclusive Framework on
Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (created 2016), as having provided strong
recommendations and standards for reducing illicit financial flows.
Noting that implementation has been challenging,
the report said many African countries and other developing countries lack the
resources and capabilities to dedicate to curbing illicit financial flows.
Additionally, the delay of many advanced economies
in fully committing to these initiatives has prevented full transparency and
contributed to the continuation of harmful tax practices.
While stopping illicit outflows of capital before
they happen is important, the new report said repatriating funds that have been
looted out can also be an important tool to solidify the domestic resource base
of African countries.
No comments:
Post a Comment