Former First Lady, Patience Jonathan, on Tuesday lost the N2billion
fundamental rights suit filed against the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission (EFCC) following the dismissal of the suit by Justice John Tsoho of
the Federal High Court in Abuja.
Tsoho in his
judgement delivered held that Mrs. Jonathan in her submission failed to sustain
claims of violations of her fundamental rights by the EFCC.
The judge further held that her suit was largely
weakened by the respondent deposition
that investigations of the alleged crimes said to have been committed by her
are ongoing and in progress.
The commission had in its deposition averred that
bogus sum of money were lodged in the sealed bank accounts linked to the former
first lady.
Justice Tsoho held that the law does limit the
period on investigation of a crime and further held that the case of the
applicant was not sustained.
On the complaint by the former first lady that the
EFCC violated her rights to private and family life, the judge said there was
no evidence to show that the respondent raided her houses. This is so,
particularly as EFCC denied it took part in the raid.
"No verifiable evidence to prove that the
applicant (Patience) is being hunted because of her views expressed during the
2015 general election campaign," the court stated.
On the applicant's alleged violation of her rights
to fair hearing before the properties were sealed, the court held that her
rights have not been violated as the court has granted the anti-graft agency an
interlocutory injunction sealing the properties on a reasonable ground of
suspicion that they were obtained by proceeds of crime.
Justice Tsoho also justified the preservative
order, adding that it does not amount to the violation of the applicant's
right.
He dismissed claims that most of the email exhibits
annexed by the applicant are online publications.
"Having made out this, I hold that the
applicant is not entitled to any of the reliefs sought. Consequently, the
applicant's suit is hereby struck out,",Justice Tsoho held.
Earlier, while delivering the judgment, the judge
had dismissed EFCC objection that Patience suit was an abuse of court process.
He said: "The suit is not an abuse of court
process as Patience was not a party in any of three suits in Lagos."
Mrs. Jonathan had in her suit filed by her counsel,
Ifedayo Adedipe (SAN), prayed the court to order EFCC to pay her the sum of N2billion
as general damages/compensation jointly and severally for the violation of her
fundamental rights.
She wanted the court to declare that her incessant
harassment by the EFCC through negative media publications, denigrating and degrading
her person as corrupt without any invitation by the Commission, trial or
conviction by a court amount to a violation of her rights under Section 37 of
the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria.
The former first lady also prayed for a declaration
that the indiscriminate freezing of her bank accounts and those of her
relatives by the EFCC under the guise of investigation of proceeds of crime
without any invitation or interrogation by the respondent (EFCC) is a violation
of her rights to own property and to fair hearing guaranteed under Sections 44
and 36(1) of the 1999 Constitution.
No comments:
Post a Comment