Two-and-a-half months before the draw for the 2018 World
Cup takes place in Moscow on Dec. 1, FIFA announced a fairly significant change
to the event’s format.
Whereas in past years World Cup draws have been partially
seeded, with the top eight teams in one pot and the remaining 24 separated by
confederation, the 2018 World Cup draw will be fully seeded.
That means Russia and the top seven qualifiers in the
October FIFA Rankings will go into Pot 1. The next eight highest-rated nations
will go into Pot 2, the next eight into Pot 3, and the final eight into Pot 4.
Geographic restrictions still apply – teams from the same region cannot be
drawn alongside each other, except for European countries, which can go
two-to-a-group – but the pots will be decided differently.
Here’s what this could hypothetically look like, based on
the current World Cup qualifying landscape the FIFA Rankings:
POT 1: Russia, Germany, Brazil, Portugal, Argentina,
Belgium, Poland, Switzerland
POT 2: France, Colombia, Spain, Peru, Mexico, England,
Uruguay, Italy
POT 3: Croatia, Northern Ireland, Costa Rica, Sweden,
Iran, USA, Egypt, Tunisia
POT 4: Serbia, Senegal, Japan, Nigeria, South Korea,
Saudi Arabia, Ivory Coast, Panama
And, for comparison’s sake, here’s how that same
hypothetical collection of 32 teams would have been divided up under the old
format:
POT 1: Russia, Germany, Brazil, Portugal, Argentina,
Belgium, Poland, Switzerland
POT 2: France, Spain, England, Italy, Croatia, Northern Ireland,
Sweden, Serbia
POT 3: Colombia, Peru, Uruguay, Egypt, Tunisia, Senegal,
Nigeria, Ivory Coast
POT 4: Mexico, Costa Rica, USA, Panama, Iran, Japan,
South Korea, Saudi Arabia
The change is welcome, and in fact, it would have been
great news for the United States in the past. The U.S. entered the 2006 World
Cup seeded 9th, just one spot outside the top pot. But was placed in the
weakest pot because CONCACAF and Asian sides were grouped together. So despite
being fine margins away from a pot with Brazil, England, Spain, Germany,
Mexico, France and Italy – and thus automatically avoiding those heavyweights
in group play – the U.S. went into a pot with Trinidad and Tobago, Costa Rica,
Serbia and Montenegro, Iran, Japan, Saudi Arabia and South Korea.
And the U.S. paid for the imperfect system back in 2006.
The Yanks were placed in a group with eventual champion Italy, golden
generation Czech Republic and emerging Ghana.
In 2010 and 2014 again, the U.S. would have been in Pot 2
had the draw been seeded 1-32. It entered 2010 seeded 11th and 2014 seeded
13th. The FIFA overlords were kind in 2010 anyway, but in 2014, the U.S. got
stuck in a four-team round-robin with Germany, Portugal and Ghana. Had the draw
been fully seeded, that group would have been impossible.
The issue is that, now that FIFA has finally decided to
make a change that would presumably help the U.S., the Americans haven’t held
up their end of the bargain. They currently sit 28th in the most recent FIFA
Rankings. That would likely see them sneak into Pot 3, because several teams
that currently rank ahead of the U.S. won’t qualify. So it’s unlikely to make a
significant difference.
Of course, the bigger issue is that the U.S. is in a
legitimate battle to qualify in the first place. It sits in fourth place in the
final round of CONCACAF qualifying, level on points with Honduras and only
ahead on goal differential. A fourth-place finish would send it to an
intercontinental playoff against either Australia or Syria. It would have to
finish third to qualify directly. It has two games remaining to leap-frog
Panama, its opponent in the first of those two games.
FIFA’s alteration will help Mexico more than anybody. El
Tri will almost certainly claim a place in Pot 2 alongside some European and
South American heavyweights. Colombia, Uruguay, Chile or Peru – whoever among
them qualify – will also benefit. The new format is most detrimental to African
nations, such as the Ivory Coast and Nigeria, and the Asian qualifiers outside
of Iran.
The broad issue with FIFA’s change is the criteria used
to seed the teams. FIFA’s ranking system is flawed, and can be gamed by astute
scheduling. That, in part, is why you see both Poland and Switzerland in the
top seven. Another eyebrow-raiser is Wales, despite early qualification
slip-ups, at No. 13, two spots behind No. 11 Spain, two ahead of No. 15
England, and four ahead of No. 17 Italy.
But the new system is certainly an improvement. It will
make the draw slightly more convoluted, with new permutations introduced to
ensure nations ultimately remain separated by continent. But that’s a
logistical issue, not a competitive one. The 1-32 seeded format makes
competitive sense.
No comments:
Post a Comment